PandaDoc vs Firma.dev

One signing API. No seats, no per-client markup.

€0.049 per envelope, with an isolated workspace for every client. No per-seat plans, no minimums.

They have Two pricing tracks, and neither one gives you everything

PandaDoc runs two separate pricing tracks, and the one you want is probably not the one you need.

The API track is priced per document. Their developer plan is $40 a month for 40 documents, which works out at a dollar each. The core product track is priced per user per month, reported at around $19 for Starter and $49 for Business.

Where each one fits

Firma.dev is the better choice when

Pricing that scales with volume, not headcount

Your cost should scale with documents sent, not with headcount

Isolated workspaces per client

Each of your clients needs their own isolated space and branding

EU hosting, no seat plan required

You need EU hosting without moving onto a per-seat plan

PandaDoc is the better choice when

Proposals, CPQ and docs in one product

You want proposals, CPQ and document generation in the same product

Built for teams that live in the editor

Your team lives inside the document editor all day

Notarisation built in

You need notarisation in the same product

Comparison

Comparison at a Glance

Checked 25 July 2026. API figures come from PandaDoc's own developer API pricing page. Per-user prices are third-party reported and marked as such.

Firma.dev

PandaDoc

€0.049

~€0.88 on the API developer plan

One

Two. Per document for the API, per user for the product

None

Reported at around $19 to $49 per user per month

Nothing beyond the envelopes they send

Potentially another seat, every month

Free to build, pay when you ship

60 documents a year

Self-serve at any volume

Enterprise. Talk to sales

Hours. Docs MCP writes it

Days to weeks. No docs MCP

Yes. Created by API

None found

Yes. Own logo, sending domain and email templates per workspace

None found. Account-level email white labeling only

Yes. EU-hosted as standard

Not on the API plan. Business tier only

Content Metric 11.1

Content Metric 11.2

Firma.dev

PandaDoc

€0.049

~€0.88 on the API developer plan

One

Two. Per document for the API, per user for the product

None

Reported at around $19 to $49 per user per month

Nothing beyond the envelopes they send

Potentially another seat, every month

Free to build, pay when you ship

60 documents a year

Self-serve at any volume

Enterprise. Talk to sales

Hours. Docs MCP writes it

Days to weeks. No docs MCP

Yes. Created by API

None found

Yes. Own logo, sending domain and email templates per workspace

None found. Account-level email white labeling only

Yes. EU-hosted as standard

Not on the API plan. Business tier only

Content Metric 11.1

Content Metric 11.2

Firma
PandaDoc

Docusign

Cost per envelope

~€0.88 on the API developer plan

Pricing tracks

Two. Per document for the API, per user for the product

Per-seat fees

Reported at around $19 to $49 per user per month

Cost of adding your tenth client

Potentially another seat, every month

Free tier

60 documents a year

Real volume

Enterprise. Talk to sales

Integration time

Days to weeks. No docs MCP

Isolated workspaces

None found

White label per workspace

None found. Account-level email white labeling only

EU data residency

Not on the API plan. Business tier only

Metric 11

Content Metric 11.2

The problem with seats when you sell to clients

The problem with seats when you sell to clients

"Multiple users connected to a big billing icon."

It charges you for headcount, not work

If you run an agency, your cost base should track the work you send out, not the number of people who touch it. Per-seat pricing inverts that. Every account manager you add costs you again every month, forever, whether they send two contracts or two hundred.

No seats, no minimums, no contract

We do not sell seats. There is no user count, no minimum, and no contract. You pay €0.049 for each envelope you send, and nothing for the ones you do not.

The idea that PandaDoc or DocuSign or whatever these providers charge for API access, it's an incredibly high price point for a company like us to pay.

Greg Bujak, VendorFlow

"Multiple documents billed at €0.049 per envelope illustration."

A separate workspace for each of your customers

This is the part that matters most for client work, and it is where the two products are least alike.

Workspaces let your application create an isolated environment for each of your own clients, provisioned through the API. Each one has its own API key, its own templates and documents, its own envelope usage, its own branding and sending domain, and its own webhook secret. Nothing is shared between them.

One workspace per client, billed on its own usage

PandaDoc's white labeling is account level. You get one custom subdomain for the whole account, so every client sees the same thing, and nothing is actually separated underneath.

With per-workspace usage counted independently, you can bill each client for their own signing volume without reconciling anything by hand.

We love the ability to silo different electronic signatures for different clients.

Joshua De La Rosa, Co-Founder and CEO, Lendrose

Creating a workspace is one call:

const workspace = await firma.workspaces.create({ name: "Acme Corp" });

Keys rotate per workspace, so ending a client relationship means revoking one key and nothing else.

Integration

Creating and sending a document is one authenticated call.

const response = await firma.signingRequests.createAndSendSigningRequest({
    "name": "Employment Contract - John Doe",
    "document": "JVBERi0xLjQKJeLjz9MK..."
});

That returns a 201 with the request already in sent status.

We publish two MCP servers, and one of them exists so an AI assistant can read our API reference and write the integration for you. We found no documentation MCP server from PandaDoc, official or otherwise.

"Two hands holding cards illustration."

Where PandaDoc is genuinely stronger

Where PandaDoc is genuinely stronger

PandaDoc is not really a signature API, it is a document platform with signing attached.

The editor, the templates, the proposal and CPQ tooling are all considerably deeper than anything we offer, and for a sales team that works inside documents all day that is a genuine reason to choose them.

We are not trying to replace a proposal builder. If what you need is signatures inside your own product or your own workflow, priced per document sent, that is a different job and it is the one we do.

PandaDoc is not really a signature API, it is a document platform with signing attached.

The editor, the templates, the proposal and CPQ tooling are all considerably deeper than anything we offer, and for a sales team that works inside documents all day that is a genuine reason to choose them.

We are not trying to replace a proposal builder. If what you need is signatures inside your own product or your own workflow, priced per document sent, that is a different job and it is the one we do.

Background Image

Get started

One pricing track. No seats, no minimums, no contracts. A separate workspace for every client, created by API.

Get started for free, no credit card required.

Background Image

Get started

One pricing track. No seats, no minimums, no contracts. A separate workspace for every client, created by API.

Get started for free, no credit card required.

Background Image

Get started

One pricing track. No seats, no minimums, no contracts. A separate workspace for every client, created by API.

Get started for free, no credit card required.